Impact of ICER Assessments on Payer Decision Making in the United States

Objectives: To evaluate how payers utilize Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) assessments to inform coverage or formulary decisions. Method(s): Double-blinded, web-based survey was fielded through Xcenda's research panel, the Managed Care Network, from June to July 2022. Result(s): A total of 51 payers from health plans (n=27), integrated delivery networks (n=12), and pharmacy benefit managers (n=12) participated in the survey. When assessing the usefulness of ICER's value assessment framework (VAF) to inform formulary decisions within their organizations, 57% of payers indicated it was extremely/very useful, 33% indicated somewhat useful, and 10% indicated not at all/not very useful. Most respondents (73%) agreed that ICER assessments are aligned with their organization's internal assessment. Utilization of ICER's VAF was most prevalent in high-cost drug or disease states (78%), rare/orphan disease states (71%), and oncology/hematology disease states (67%). Payers reported less use in primary care disease states (29%), COVID-19 (8%), and digital therapeutics (4%). In the last 24 months, 20% of payers reported ICER's recommendations often influenced coverage decisions, 59% indicated occasional influence, and 22% indicated no influence. In the last 24 months, payers indicated the top 5 ICER assessments that influenced their coverage decisions included high cholesterol (38%), Alzheimer's disease (36%), atopic dermatitis (33%), multiple myeloma (31%), and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (28%). ICER assessments that were less impactful included beta thalassemia (3%), digital health technologies (3%), and supervised injection facilities (3%). Payers reported using ICER assessments to inform both expanded and restricted coverage decisions. Conclusion(s): Payers find ICER's VAF useful to inform their organization's formulary decisions. ICER's assessments often align with payers' internal assessments and are most frequently utilized for high-cost drugs or disease states. Payers indicate ICER assessments have affected both expansion and restriction in their coverage policies.Copyright © 2023

COVID-19 case with prolonged neutropenia

In this article, we present the follow-up and treatment process of neutropenia, which develops during COVID-19 infection in a healthy adult and lasts for approximately 45 days. When the patient applied with the complaints of weakness and joint pain, the PCR test was positive and neutropenia and lymphopenia were detected in the laboratory examination. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) treatment was started in order to prevent the development of secondary infection to the patient, who was evaluated for additional medical treatment for neutropenia while the COVID-19 treatment was continuing. However, it was observed that neutropenia returned to normal after 1.5 months. Neutropenia secondary to COVID-19 infection can be seen in healthy adults and it is thought that the use of G-CSF in the treatment will be beneficial. © 2022, Pamukkale University. All rights reserved.

PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF UPADACITINIB THROUGH ONE YEAR IN PATIENTS WITH NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

BackgroundUpadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in patients (pts) with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) through 14 weeks (wks) of treatment.[1]ObjectivesThis analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of UPA vs placebo (PBO) through 1 year.MethodsThe SELECT-AXIS 2 nr-axSpA study included a 52-wk randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled period. Enrolled adults had a clinical diagnosis of active nr-axSpA fulfilling the 2009 ASAS classification criteria, objective signs of inflammation based on MRI sacroiliitis and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and an inadequate response to NSAIDs. One-third of pts had an inadequate response to biologic DMARDs. Pts were randomized 1:1 to UPA 15 mg once daily or PBO. Concomitant medications, including NSAIDs, had to be kept stable through wk 52. The study protocol outlined that pts who did not achieve ASAS20 at any two consecutive study visits between wks 24 to 52 should receive rescue therapy with NSAIDs, corticosteroids, conventional synthetic/biologic DMARDs, or analgesics. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test with non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) was used to handle missing data and intercurrent events for binary efficacy endpoints. Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) was used to assess continuous efficacy endpoints. NRI was used for binary endpoints after rescue and as observed analysis excluding data after rescue for continuous endpoints. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported through wk 52.ResultsOf the 314 pts randomized, 259 (82%;UPA, n=130;PBO, n=129) completed wk 52 on study drug. More pts achieved an ASAS40 response with UPA vs PBO from wks 14 to 52 with a 20% treatment difference at wk 52 (63% vs 43%;nominal P <.001;Figure 1). The proportion of pts achieving ASDAS inactive disease with UPA remained higher than PBO at wk 52 (33% vs 11%;nominal P <.0001;Figure 1). Consistent improvements and maintenance of efficacy were also seen across other disease activity measures. Between wks 24 and 52, fewer pts on UPA (9%) than PBO (17%) received rescue therapy. A similar proportion of pts in each treatment group had a TEAE (Table 1). Infections were the most common TEAE;the rates of serious infections and herpes zoster were higher with UPA vs PBO, although no new serious infections were reported from wks 14 to 52. COVID-19 events were balanced between treatment groups. No opportunistic infections, malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, inflammatory bowel disease, or deaths were reported. Two pts (1.3%) on PBO had adjudicated venous thromboembolic events.ConclusionUPA showed consistent improvement and maintenance of efficacy vs PBO through 1 year across multiple disease activity measures. No new safety risks were identified with longer-term UPA exposure. These results continue to support the benefit of UPA in pts with active nr-axSpA.Reference[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2022;400(10349):369–379.Table 1.Safety through week 52Event, n (%)PBO (n = 157)UPA 15 mg QD (n = 156)Any AE103 (66%)107 (69%)Serious AE6 (3.8%)6 (3.8%)AE leading to D/C4 (2.5%)6 (3.8%)COVID-19-related AE22 (14%)24 (15%)Deaths00Infection60 (38%)68 (44%) Serious infection1 (0.6%)2 (1.3%) Herpes zoster1 (0.6%)5 (3.2%)Malignancy other than NMSC00NMSC1 (0.6%)0Hepatic disorder7 (4.5%)6 (3.8%)Neutropenia1 (0.6%)8 (5.1%)MACE (adjudicated)00VTE (adjudicated)2 (1.3%)a0Uveitisb3 (1.9%)2 (1.3%)Inflammatory bowel disease00aBoth patients had non-serious events of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb with risk factors including obesity and prior deep vein thrombosis in one patient and concomitant COVID-19 infection in the other patient.bThree events of uveitis occurred in each treatment group (among n = 3 patients in the PBO group and n = 2 patients in the UPA group);two events in the PBO group and one in the UPA group occurred in patients with a history of uveitis.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, res arch, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, review, and approval of the . All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Julia Zolotarjova, MSc, MWC, of AbbVie.Disclosure of InterestsFilip van den Bosch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Atul Deodhar Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Aurinia, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Denis Poddubnyy Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biocad, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Medscape, MoonLake, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Medscape, MoonLake, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer., Walter P Maksymowych Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Employee of: Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Employee of: Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Tae-Hwan Kim Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celltrion, Kirin, Lilly, and Novartis., Mitsumasa Kishimoto Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and UCB., Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Novartis, Yuanyuan Duan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Kristin D'Silva Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Peter Wung Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, In-Ho Song Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie.

Teclistamab in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-2 study)

Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.

Preliminary results from phase 2 of CC-92480- MM- 001: Mezigdomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)

In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.

Postnatal SARSCOV2 Infection in Neonates, Characteristics and Outcomes: An Observational Study

Background: Many aspects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) pandemic in 2019 have been unclear, especially in newborns, and reports of neonatal diseases are usually associated with perinatal infection. Objective(s): The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and para-clinical manifestations in newborns that contracted the infection after birth. Method(s): This observational research was conducted from October 2020 to March 2022 to examine postnatal SARSCoV2 infection in infants admitted to the NICU or neonatal ward at the Children's Medical Center in Tehran, Iran. Inclusion in the study was open to neonates who had positive RT-PCR results postnatally. Result(s): In total, 55 newborns were confirmed to have postnatal SARSCOV2. Fever was the most frequently observed symptom, with 35 (61%). Necrotizing enterocolitis was seen in 18% of neonates, and 30% of them were preterm. Neutropenia was seen in 34% of cases, with five cases having severe neutropenia. All neonates had a normal platelet count. Twenty percent of patients showed C-reactive protein higher than 6 mg/L. Two newborns had co-existing bacterial urinary tract infections. Our neonates didn't require antiviral, anticoagulant, or corticosteroid medications, and they recovered while receiving only supportive care. Everyone in the group of newborns was discharged without complications, and there were no deaths. Conclusion(s): The high rate of fever, high C-reactive protein, and neutropenia in SARSCoV2 neonates suggests that more observational research is needed to compare these symptoms to bacterial sepsis to avoid the overuse of antibiotics in these patients.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES UNDER TREATMENT WITH BIOLOGICAL THERAPY: INFORMATION FROM BIOBADAMEX

BackgroundThe advent of biologic treatment (bDMARD) in childhood rheumatic diseases (RD) has changed their evolution and prognosis. Evidence is robust for diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but in other diseases we still have to learn which is the ideal therapy, time to discontinuation and the potential adverse events (AE) in short and long term.ObjectivesIdentify the clinical and treatment characteristics of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases with bDMARD treatment and describe the development of AE.MethodsBIOBADAMEX is a prospective ongoing cohort of Mexican patients with RD using bDMARDs since 2016. We included all patients younger than 18 years of age registered in BIOBADAMEX. Descriptive statistics were used for the baseline characteristics and the Chi-square test to analyze the differences between the characteristics of the groups in relation to the development of AE.ResultsA total of 45 patients were included, 31 (69%) of them female, mean age of 13.3 (±3.6) years. (Table 1).The most frequent diagnosis was JIA 25 (56%), followed by SLE 9 (20%), uveitis 5 (11%), polymyositis/dermatomyositis and hidradenitis 2 (4%) respectively;systemic sclerosis and CINCA 1 patient (2%) respectively. The mean duration disease in years was 4.67 (±2.1). Nine patients (20%) used a biologic prior to the current;23 (51%) patients had comorbidities.The most frequent bDMARDs used was Adalimumab (ADA) in 17 (38%) patients followed by Rituximab in 15 (33%) and Tocilizumab in 10 (22%), Infliximab, Abatacept and Canakinumab were used in one patient respectively.When compared by groups, ADA and Tocilizumab were the most used bDMARDs in JIA, Rituximab the only one used in SLE and PM/DM, and ADA the only one for uveitis.15 patients discontinued biological treatment, 4 (27%) due to AE. 82% used an additional synthetic DMARD, being methotrexate the most used in 48% of patients. Steroids were used by 21 (47%) of the patients with a median dose of 10mg (IQR 5 - 25).Fifteen AEs were recorded: 7 (47%) were infections, 5 of these (71%) were COVID;allergies and neutropenia in 2 (13%) patients respectively. By disease infections were more frequent in patients with JIA and Uveitis;neutropenia only occurred in patients with JIA (p 0.95). 87% of the AEs were non-serious, 1 patient with JIA presented a severe AE and one patient with SLE a fatal AE associated with COVID (p 0.93), with no statistically significant difference between groups.ConclusionJIA is the most frequent indication to use bDMARD as worldwide reported. The AE in this analysis are similar to previous registries in terms of the prevalence of infections, in our group the most frequent infectious complication was COVID, being fatal in one patient related with rituximab in SLE. Our study did not find statistically significant differences in the development of AE between diseases;however, they will continue to be reported and the number of patients in the registry will increase.References[1] Sterba,Y.et al. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2016;18,45[2] Fuhlbrigge RC, et al. 2021;47(4):531-543.Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline characteristics (n = 45)n%Female, n(%)3168.9Age, media (SD)13.3 (±3.6)Index Body Mass, media (SD)19.6 (±4.9)Dx n(%)n %- JIA25 55.6- SLE9 20- PM/DM2 4.4- Uveitis5 11.1- Hidradenitis2 4.4- Systemic sclerosis1 2.2- CINCA1 2.2Disease duration(years) media (IQR)4.67±2.1Current treatment n(%)n %- Infliximab1 2.2- Adalimumab17 37.8- Rituximab15 33.3- Abatacept1 2.2- Tocilizumab10 22.2- Canakinumab1 2.2Treatment duration (months) median (IQR)4.5 (0.56 – 36.9)Treatment suspension, n(%)15 (33.2)Months to suspension, median (IQR)0.66 (0.46 – 1)Discontinue cause, n(%)n %- Inefficacy1 6.6- Remission1 6.6- Side effects4 26.6- Others5 33.3- Unknown4 26.6Steroids use, n(%):21 46.7Steroids dose (mg), median (IQR)10 5 – 25DMARDs use n(%):37 82.2AE, n(%):15 33.3By disease:AE TypeInfectionAllergyNeutropeniaOtherChi2JIA31230.95SLE1101Uveitis3000Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsSamara Mendieta: None declare , Alfonso Torres: None declared, Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos: None declared, Sandra Sicsik: None declared, Iris Jazmin Colunga-Pedraza: None declared, Daniel Xavier Xibille Friedmann: None declared, Deshire Alpizar-Rodriguez Employee of: Scientific advisor in GSK-Mexico, VIJAYA RIVERA TERAN: None declared.

Safety of Pharmacotherapy in COVID-19 Patients: A Literature Review.

The safety of COVID-19 pharmacotherapy is a relevant issue, first of all, because of the current lack of experience with using particular medicinal products and with off-label prescribing. The aim of the study was to analyse information on potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their predictors in etiology- and pathogenesis-oriented COVID-19 therapy. According to literature data, the main clinically significant risk factors for COVID-19 patients to develop an ADR are the duration of their hospital stay, combined use of antivirals, polypharmacy, and their history of drug allergies. The most common adverse reactions to antivirals, to virus-neutralising antibodies, and to human anti-COVID-19 immunoglobulin and convalescent plasma are, respectively, gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders;gastrointestinal disorders, neurological disorders, and allergic reactions;and transfusion reactions (fever, chills, etc.). For pathogenesis-oriented therapy with systemic glucocorticosteroids, the most characteristic ADR is hyperglycaemia. Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin inhibitors are most often associated with gastrointestinal disorders and hypertransaminasemia;neutropenia is also characteristic of a number of interleukin inhibitors. Haemostatic adverse reactions to anticoagulants depend on the patient's dosing regimen and condition. Drug-drug interactions are a common problem in COVID-19 treatment, with the combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir showing the largest number of significant interactions attributed to their pharmacokinetics. Currently, there is data on the role of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in the safety and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 therapy. Thus, to improve the safety of COVID-19 therapy, an integrated approach is needed that will take into account both the clinical, demographic, and pharmacogenetic predictors of ADRs and the risk of drug-drug interactions.Copyright © 2023 Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. All rights reserved.

Disseminated Mucormycosis in a patient on long term immunosuppression: Severe fungal infections as multi-system disorders

Introduction: Mucormycosis is a rare, severe fungal infection with an incidence of 0.005 to 0.17 per million.1 but incidence has risen recently, particularly in the Asian subcontinent, due to use of immunosuppression for Covid19.2 Presentations can vary and are classified into: rhino-orbito-cerebral, pulmonary, cutaneous, disseminated, renal and gastrointestinal. Risk factors include diabetes, immunosuppression, iron overload, malnutrition, and prematurity.1,3 Although mucormycosis has an extremely high mortality rate and disseminated infection is usually fatal, treatment options exist if diagnosed early and surgical debridement may be curative. Objective(s): We present a case of mucormycois in a female patient in her 40s who was immunosuppressed with methotrexate for rheumatoid disease. This case is discussed to increase awareness of critical illness caused by opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients and promote timely identification and management. Method(s): We detail the clinical context and management of a patient with mucormycosis and discuss relevant literature. Result(s): A female patient in her 40s who had been experiencing upper respiratory tract symptoms for several weeks, including cough and brown sputum, was admitted with a presumptive diagnosis of methotrexate toxicity after a full blood count performed by the general practitioner demonstrated pancytopenia. Initially, National Early Warning System 2 score (NEWS2) was 2 but became intensely hypertensive during blood transfusion and then profoundly shocked with an escalating NEWS2. Broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluconazole were commenced for neutropenic sepsis and the patient was referred to critical care in multiple organ failure. Computerised tomography (CT) scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis showed "left upper lobe consolidation, which with neutropenia might represent an angioinvasive aspergillosis". She had multiple areas of skin discolouration and desquamation. Haematology and Infectious Diseases opinions were sought, and a bone marrow biopsy was performed which showed severe toxic effects consistent with sepsis/life threatening infection. Progressive proptosis was noted, and CT scan of her head was requested. Sadly, she was never stable enough for CT transfer. Beta D Glucan and aspergillus antigen serology was negative. Broncho-alveolar lavage demonstrated Candida albicans and then, later, Rhizopus arrhizus was isolated and anti-fungal treatment changed to voriconazole and then amphotericin B. Upon reviewing the notes in light of the positive culture for Rhizopus, the patient had likely been exhibiting symptomatic Mucormycosis sinus infection for some time prior to this admission with disseminated infection. The patient's condition continued to deteriorate and she sadly died. Conclusion(s): * The Early Warning Score significantly underestimated how unwell the patient was upon arrival in ED, a systems-based assessment would have demonstrated that the patient had multiple system dysfunction and significant potential to deteriorate suddenly despite having stable observations * The methotrexate level has no clinical value in diagnosing or refuting a diagnosis of methotrexate toxicity * A full examination of the immunosuppressed patient including ENT is a necessity when searching for a source of infection * Invasive fungal infections can cause multi-system symptoms and atypical presentations * As a greater proportion of patients have received systemic immunosuppression for Covid-19, vigilance for more unusual pathogens, including Mucormycosis by clinicians is advised.

Five years of adjuvant chemotherapy in a tertiary oncology centre: outcomes and impact of GCSF on completion of treatment

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with adjuvant vinorelbine-platinum chemotherapy experience neutropenia, which may lead to early termination of treatment. However, evidence suggests that survival is superior in patients who complete four cycles of chemotherapy [1]. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) prophylaxis is used to prevent neutropenia. During the COVID pandemic, the threshold for initiating prophylaxis was lowered to reduce need for hospital attendance with the concomitant risk of hospital-acquired infection [2]. We evaluated whether GCSF prophylaxis supported completion of chemotherapy in patients treated at St Bartholomew's Hospital. Method(s): Data was retrospectively collected on the 112 patients with NSCLC who received adjuvant vinorelbine-platinum chemotherapy (total 349 cycles) in the period Jan 2017- Jul 2022. GCSF prophylaxis was prescribed at physician discretion. chi2 tests were carried out using SPSS 28. Result(s): A significantly higher proportion of patients who received GCSF prophylaxis completed four cycles of chemotherapy (chi2=5.120, p=0.024). These patients also experienced a lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (chi2=6.801, p=0.009). Over 5 years, 2/112 (1.75%) patients died, both from neutropenic sepsis;neither of these patients received prophylactic GCSF. GCSF prophylaxis was not associated with increase in the incidence of thromboembolic events (chi2=1.462, p=0.442). Conclusion(s): GCSF is safe and effective as primary prophylaxis in NSCLC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Use of GCSF will reduce proportion of post-operative patients considered too high risk for chemotherapy due to concerns about neutropenia. Disclosure: No significant relationships. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Mild COVID-19 outcomes in adults with inborn errors of immunity: a single-center experience

Currently, 640 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 6.6 million deaths have been reported world-wide. Risk factors for severe COVID-19 are known, including those with compromised immunity. Among patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI), early reports of severe outcomes lead to strict masking and social distancing measures. While this resulted in relatively low infection rates among those with IEI, real-world data describing the clinical course of COVID-19 in this patient population have remained limited. We performed a retrospective study of adult IEI patients followed by our center in which a positive test (rapid antigen or PCR) for COVID-19 was determined between November 2021-November 2022. Medical charts were reviewed, and patient interviews conducted. All patients provided informed consent. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled (22 females, 7 males), aged between 18-69 years (median: 20-29 years). The cohort included those with antibody deficiencies (41.37%), combined immunodeficiencies (34.48%;HIES, CARD11, STAT1-GOF), immune dysregulation disorders (20.69%;LRBA deficiency, AIRE deficiency) and phagocyte defect (3.45%;CGD). The duration of symptoms ranged between 3 days-4 weeks (median: < 1 week). Upper respiratory symptoms (including sore throat, congestion) were reported in 97% while fever was present in 41% of patients. Prior to infection, 14 (48%) patients had underlying asthma or bronchiectasis - 2 subsequently experienced shortness of breath and were treated with inhalers or Sotrovimab, respectively. No treatment was required in 65.5% of cases. The remaining received Paxlovid (10.3%), Sotrovimab (13.79%), or antibiotics (10.3%). Of the 2 patients with STAT1-GOF, one tested positive during a repeat episode of febrile neutropenia which required hospitalization. No other patients were hospitalized or needed ICU admission. No deaths were recorded. In light of these favourable outcomes, patients with IEI can gradually and safely return to normal activities.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Clinical profile and outcomes of COVID-19 infection during the first wave in children with hematological illnesses and cancer: An observational study from a tertiary care center in North India

Background: Patients with cancer are at a higher risk of getting infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 owing to their immunocompromised state. Providing care to these patients amidst the first wave of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was extremely challenging. Objective(s): This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical profile and disease-related outcomes of pediatric patients with hematological illnesses and cancer. Material(s) and Method(s): This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India during the first wave of the pandemic from March 2020 to December 2020. Children aged up to 18 years, who were treated for a hematological illness or malignancy or underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and tested positive for COVID-19 regardless of symptoms were included in the study. Baseline demographic data related to the age, diagnosis, treatment status, and chemotherapy protocol used were collected. Outcomes including the cure rates, comorbidities, and sequelae were recorded. Result(s): A total of 650 tests for COVID-19 were performed for 181 children;22 patients were found to be COVID-19 positive. The most common diagnosis was acute leukemia (63.6%). None of the patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia. The majority of patients had asymptomatic infection and were managed at home. Among those with a symptomatic infection, the most common symptoms were fever and cough. A total of 3 (13.6%) patients needed oxygen therapy, one developed multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children leading to cardiogenic shock. Three patients required intensive care or respiratory support;all the patients had favorable clinical outcomes. The median time from the onset of COVID-19 to a negative result on the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test was 21.3 days. Cancer treatment was modified in 15 patients (68.2%). Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that children with hemato-oncological illnesses rarely experience severe COVID-19 disease. The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 primarily manifested as disruptions in the logistic planning and administration of essential treatment to these children rather than COVID-19 sequelae.Copyright © 2021 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.

ECMO for the immunocompromised pediatric patient: Our experience

Objectives: To present a series of immunosuppressed patients (oncohematological disease, congenital immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT), and solid organ transplant) assisted on ECMO. Method(s): Descriptive, retrospective study (2011-2020) of a cohort of 9 immunosuppressed patients, supported on ECMO. Medical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Result(s): In our series of 9 patients, 5 were male, the median age was 8 years [RIC 3-11 years]. Considering the underlying disease, 6 were oncologic, 1 liver transplant and 2 with congenital immunodeficiency after HSCT. 4 were under active chemotherapy (median 6 days after the last cycle [RIC 5-188]). 6 were admitted due to acute respiratory failure, 3 due to hemodynamic instability (3/9), (one septic shock). The median PEEP was 12 [RIC 9-15] and FiO2 100% (81-100%). 78% (6) required vasoactive drugs (median inotropic score 35 [RIC 0-75]. 40%. 5 had severe neutropenia and/or plateletopenia in the 24 hours prior to ECMO, and alterations in acid-base balance (median pH 7. 1 [RIC 6.9-7.15]. 5 were on multiorgan failure. TPrimary ECMO transport was performed in 4 patients (44%). Cannulation was peripheral in 80% (57% cervical, 43% femoral) and central in 20%;70% VA-ECMO. Median time of assistance was 15 days [RIC 3.5-31.5] in cardiac ECMO (4), and 29 days [RIC 13.5-42] and in pulmonary ECMO (n=5). The median total time of admission was 45 days [RIC 27-59]. 9 had an infection, 2 COVID after HSCT, and 8 bleeding complications, but only one required surgical revision. Renal replacement therapy was used in 5 (median 9 days [RIC 5-34.5]). Other therapies used were polymyxin hemadsorption(2), intratracheal surfactant(2), plasma exchange(1), infusion of mesenchymal cells(1) and specific memory T lymphocytes(2). 4 patients died, 5 survived decannulation, 2 died later, with an overall survival rate to hospital discharge of 33% (3/9). Conclusion(s): Despite having a worse prognosis, ECMO can increase survival in immunosuppressed patients, in situations that are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach.

Pulmonary infections in cancer patients

Lymphangitis carcinomatosa refers to pulmonary interstitial involvement by cancer and is a dreaded clinical finding in oncology because it is a late manifestation indicative of metastatic malignancy, from either a lung or a nonlung primary cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis. Its presentation is nonspecific, often with subacute dyspnoea and a nonproductive cough in a person with a known history of malignancy, but in some cases is the first manifestation of cancer. CT imaging can be suggestive, typically demonstrating thickening of the peribronchovascular interstitium, interlobular septa and fissures. However, a biopsy may be required to confirm the pathological diagnosis as these changes can also be due to concurrent disease such as heart failure, ILD, infection, radiation pneumonitis and drug reactions. Diagnosis allows symptomatic treatment, with personalised treatment directed towards the primary cancer most likely to provide a meaningful benefit. Future research should focus on prospective clinical trials to identify new interventions to improve both diagnosis and treatment of lymphangitis carcinomatosa.Copyright © ERS 2021.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Refractory to Biologic Therapies: 2-Year Results from the Phase 3 Select-Psa 2 Study

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to >=1 biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECTPsA 2. Methods Pts were randomized to UPA 15mg (UPA15), UPA 30mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks;PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received >=1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results A total of 641 pts received >=1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks. Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient's assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 were consistent with that reported at wk 56. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information;however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and two with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to>=1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to two years of treatment. No new safety signals were identified in this long-term extension.

Esophageal Mucosal Calcinosis: A Rare Site of Calcium Deposition in End-Stage Renal Disease

Introduction: Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcium uremic arteriolopathy, is defined as calcium deposition around blood vessels in skin and fat tissue which occurs in 1-4% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Calcium deposition in the esophagus is extremely rare;to date, there have been only 4 cases reported worldwide. We report the fifth case of esophageal mucosal calcinosis occurring in a young male with ESRD. Case Description/Methods: A 37-year-old Thai man with ESRD on peritoneal dialysis since 2005 presented with generalized weakness and odynophagia due to oral ulcers, resulting in poor PO intake. He denied drinking alcohol, illicit drug use, or smoking. On exam his abdomen was soft, non-distended, non-tender, without any guarding. Past medical history included hypertension and COVID-19 in January 2022. Laboratory tests revealed neutropenia and pancytopenia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia. EGD revealed distal esophageal esophagitis and hemorrhagic erosive gastropathy. Biopsy showed ulcerative esophagitis with dystrophic calcification, consistent with esophageal mucosal calcinosis .No intestinal metaplasia was noted. Immunohistochemistry was negative for CMV, HSV1, and HSV2. The patient was treated with pantoprazole 40mg IV every 12 hours, Magic Mouthwash 5ml qid, and Carafate 10mg qid. He was transferred to a cancer center where he had a bone marrow biopsy formed which was negative. His symptoms resolved and the patient was discharged to home (Figure). Discussion(s): Esophageal mucosal calcinosis is extremely rare. It is due to a combination of factors involving acidosis and the phenotypic differentiation (and apoptosis) of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) into chondrocytes or osteoblast-like cells. These changes, along with the passive accumulation of calcium and phosphate, induce calcification. Acidosis is well-known to promote inflammation of the arterial walls, releasing cytokines that induce vascular calcification. The benefits of treatment with sodium thiosulfate remain unclear. An ample collection of cases should help devise standardized treatment options and establish management guidelines for this condition.

The Effects of GCSF Primary Prophylaxis on Survival Outcomes and Toxicity in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy: A Sub-Analysis of the Spinnaker Study.

GCSF prophylaxis is recommended in patients on chemotherapy with a >20% risk of febrile neutropenia and is to be considered if there is an intermediate risk of 10−20%. GCSF has been suggested as a possible adjunct to immunotherapy due to increased peripheral neutrophil recruitment and PD-L1 expression on neutrophils with GCSF use and greater tumour volume decrease with higher tumour GCSF expression. However, its potential to increase neutrophil counts and, thus, NLR values, could subsequently confer poorer prognoses on patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis follows on from the retrospective multicentre observational cohort Spinnaker study on advanced NSCLC patients. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were the frequency and severity of AEs and irAEs. Patient information, including GCSF use and NLR values, was collected. A secondary comparison with matched follow-up duration was also undertaken. Three hundred and eight patients were included. Median OS was 13.4 months in patients given GCSF and 12.6 months in those not (p = 0.948). Median PFS was 7.3 months in patients given GCSF and 8.4 months in those not (p = 0.369). A total of 56% of patients receiving GCSF had Grade 1−2 AEs compared to 35% who did not receive GCSF (p = 0.004). Following an assessment with matched follow-up, 41% of patients given GCSF experienced Grade 1−2 irAEs compared to 23% of those not given GCSF (p = 0.023). GCSF prophylaxis use did not significantly affect overall or progression-free survival. Patients given GCSF prophylaxis were more likely to experience Grade 1−2 adverse effects and Grade 1−2 immunotherapy-related adverse effects.